June 23, 2009

The Schedule of Pain

Pain is something odd, especially chronic pain, because it is something that is impossible to quantify, impossible to explain without feeling forced to justify it to someone else, and largely invisible. You experience it alone, and it’s impossible to share it, the physical feelings, or the feelings and moods that become steeped in the physical pain, with anyone else. All consuming, yet bothersome and disappointing when this becomes more of a lifestyle than a one-night stand to others. I personally always feel like I am doubted, seen as making excuses, disbelieved, and in a position to justify and quantify what can’t be.

It would be nice to muse philosophically about my chronic pain; how the universe really socked it to me when my biggest medical decision at the time was the how and when’s of a ‘needed’ rhinoplasty, and the deliberation over a return to sex work in fetish porn came to an abrupt halt considering the contortion that goes along with physically abusive (‘demanding’) shoots.
But that would require the focus and sanity that comes from not having that pain sucking all your mental and physical energy.

Instead, I will detail what, as of today, I understand to be the ideal start to my day if I am to get anywhere or do anything.
Wake. I will probably be on the floor, on my lush pallet of yoga mats and comforters. Once made hastily in the early morning hours after wrestling with pain in bed, its really become a fixture now. Usually both are slept in alternatively a few times in the course of one night.
Take one type of pain medication. Roll around and whine some, each movement articulated by sharp, shooting pains. Decide on another type of pain medication. Mixing pain medications is like a crap shoot for which mix is going to let you walk. What a fabulous prize.
Skip showering and hunch over sink for a quick face wash.
Shuffle downstairs for the icepack in the freezer.
Let dog out. No more early morning walks for you, pookie!
Eat breakfast and consider getting dressed. In figuring out what to wear, I long for muumuus, something that I can just lift my arms to effortlessly enter. Shoes that I can slip into. Dressing that requires no bending, just sliding into loose fitting things from an erect posture.
Fall behind.
Call to cancel things.
Not have calls returned in a timely manner from medical health professionals.
Feel exhausted and go lay down. Lay in bed, ice pack still intact and write this blog.
With a sleeping dog by my side, I’m sure we are both yearning for the same things.
We both yearn for days full of regularity, schedule, ease, I at least know that I am trying to remember what life was life before all of this.
I’m sure what we are both yearning for is spending these summer days outside.

June 20, 2009

Summer of Firsts

Two substantial firsts. I’m back from a two hour late-night walk around the city, and now stationed at my desk, with half of a petite, icy watermelon, bowl-up and sitting ready in front of me. It is officially summer. With the time spent trekking around, I felt the familiar and sharp pangs of summer yearnings. In that quiet time, I had little choice but to hone in on the absence of what summers usually hold for me, and that led me to reflecting on loneliness and how unusual being alone and un-partnered in the summer is for me.

This will be the first summer in (counting on fingers, then resorting to scratch paper) 5 years that I will be completely single. No prospects, no still living with an ex in a dignity-void codependent purgatory, completely free or uncomfortably alone, often one in the same. Where I won’t deny that I am still struggling with feeling that I may be wasting a portion of the minutes of life I have without someone to document them or share some of them with, I am also still reveling in relearning freedom that I never got to test out and unlearning all of the abusive, harmful rhetoric that were mainstays of all my periods of coupledom.

This will also be the first summer in 7 years where I will not be working in sex work (it’s now six days after my 26th birthday, G-d help me, you do the math). That’s a pretty big deal for me, even among all the other transition that has taken place this year that doesn’t make this a summer to remember solely for this reason. But it’s so oddly new, I will admit I feel a little lost.

For some people I suppose when the southern air grows thick and heavy, and nights of thunder, lightening and torrential down pour leave you stumbling through an overgrown, apt concrete jungle (thanks, Axel), maybe they just get an itch for bikinis, liquor, cut offs and porch swings. Maybe these folks are also haunted with the ritualistic yearning for sweaty faces pressed together by the river, and a sour, hot, unfamiliar tongue fishing around their mouths while intoxicating infatuation rots away their sensibility and rationality. I get those itches too, but almost like a craving, I get the deep itch after these years for bookings too hot for vinyl, the sounds of the few that were without air conditioning- the distinct sound made by my flogger slapping around on the upper crest of the back; more soggy than crisp (more of a basting, than a beating)-I savor these now. The engulfing heat and all of its sweat that made it so hard to be so serious. I miss that too. All while knowing how easy it is to romanticize in retrospect.

Part of this sense of loss is the onset of the loss of my youth; part of me would like to draw the type of clients I did forever, to keep the work, travel, rush of excitement, fast income, sense of expertise and power going for forever, to maintain that peak position that the trifecta of youth, ‘beauty’, and power let me feel once (even though worn as an outfit, only given by the typically older, white, rich man in scene that I would never be granted as privilege on the street). Maybe at the root of this is admitting some remorse, regret, and indecision in letting a year of my youth go by without exploiting it to its fullest advantage. It’s a tenuous pull and push between a future I don’t have yet, the fear that surrounds being an active sex worker for me, and the deep, known lure for all the aforementioned reasons and more.

May 27, 2009

Why Yesterday’s Prop 8 Ruling Makes No Sense

The verdict delivered by The Supreme Court of the United States yesterday technically had little, if anything to do with the rights of gay, lesbian, and bisexual couples or the right to marry (sorry gender variants and trans friends- we’re still working on our lives not being classified as a disorder, or toward actually existing on forms of identification) . The fuckery at hand is quite simple to understand, once you break it down into simple steps and job descriptions. So, let’s go.

In the justices’ consideration for the ruling was the constitutionality of the direct-elect initiative process that was used to ascend base majority opinion about gay and lesbian marriage into the elite (for good reason) and upper echelon of Constitutionality . In effect, this direct-elect initiative process allowed a majority of Californian citizens to restrict and dictate the reach and enactment of the United States Constitution to its minority citizens. This power is what they were deciding upon, and whether it was a valid method of enacting constitutional law.
And this is why I can’t believe they have come to reject in an overwhelming 6-1 affirmation of the process.

To detach ourselves for a minute from the subject of the Propostion that was passed, regardless of the affected population of ANY direct-elect initiative- this method of enacting constitutional law, when applied to any human being or human issue, in and of itself is a civil rights issue.
Why? Well, because the Supreme Court gave the go ahead for majority rule to be the measure of any minorities constitutional freedoms, rights, and liberties of citizenship and personhood. And well, that’s just plain wrong. It just doesn’t make sense.
Why? For the simple fact of, or what I and so many other people thought, was one of the main principles of the basic SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) job description- is to ensure fair and balanced application of the U.S. Constitution through objective and skillful interpretation thus maintaining the credibility, strength, and virtue of this foundational document of this nation (’sposedly).

Demonstrated through decades of precedent, the key principle I am focusing on is the Court’s commitment to afford equal protection to minority citizens, from which their full constitutional rights as citizens have historically been withheld and restricted by the mob rule of society / the power-dominant majority, whichever way you want to slice it. The courts job description then includes the provision that a U.S. citizen’s* (however that is currently defined to include/exclude) share of constitutional rights are to be granted with personhood, and not (theoretically) to be detracted for the color of one’s skin, socio-economic class, gender (*rolls eyes*), ability, age, and forth.

Again, whether marriage is a right included in the personal liberties and freedoms the constitution affords with citizenship, whether marriage is a specifically hetero institution, or any other of the key questions that are really at the heart of extending or prohibiting equal marriage rights to everyone constitutionally (just Lesbians and Gays, really. Again, sorry trans and gender variant friends.) was not specifically up for debate yesterday. But the above (the right of the citizen majority to create law governing citizen minority, without the approval of national or state powers), was.

This is the point of failure (or contention) for yesterday’s court ruling that has my mind puttering around all it has learned from constitutional law and case studies. This ruling ‘okays’ the right of the most absurdly small majority of California’s citizens to enact law for the other citizens that fall into this minority.
What the fuck, Supreme Court? This is why you exist, to prevent mob rule, to prevent fundamentalist social opinion from ascending the marble steps and tinkering with law, from adjusting with, or picking and choosing the rights and liberties society’s dissenting minorities are able to enjoy. Your very purpose is to ensure that the biased judgment that taints so many citizens, is as far from the enactment of constitutional law as possible, this principle is at the heart of your structure, organization, and governance. So, what the hell happened?

Was the nation’s cultural climate just not at Gay o’ clock yet? Would this overstep the Obama administration’s paltry position offering of the strewn crumbs of domestic partnership (one day?) ? Were these consequences just too great?

When Proposition 8 initially passed, something remarkable happened. As the unaffected moderates, conservatives snuggled firmly in party platforms, and comfortable heterosexuals drifted off to sleep with the lull of satisfaction from Obama’s win, California erupted. As thousands of others across the country riled in private protest or heart wrenching disbelief, something started. The streets filed, cops cars were mounted, rage rolled. This is the righteous anger that any successful civil rights movement has fed on. Over time, queers have gained a sense of entitlement to the citizenship that corporate demographic courting, and moderate social acceptance had afforded them, yet was shown to be all too unreal. When I first saw the picture of a young man who had bound to the top of a cop car in San Francisco, one hand clutching a sign, the other’s fist thrust sharply toward the night sky, his bold stance, I felt solace and hope. Hope that the soma of assimilation, of unreal acceptance without the tangible rights that would make Queers fully human in law was beginning to wear off.

I know that they may have won the day, but they have not won the war. I know that this is only adding fuel to the fire that is needed to bring this demand of ending Queer dehumanization to fruition.

But this is what I am really afraid of. I know perhaps thousands of powerful conservative forces were salivating over this decision as it was handed down. Just imagine the possibilities of the direct-elect process. If all tinkering with Constitutionality takes is a heap of money to fund fear mongering campaigns and rally influential conservative religious bases, can you just envision the future? Think about a woman’s right to control her own reproduction, gay or lesbian rights to domestic partnership or even just to keep their children, gun control, access to birth control, state funding for social services, sex work, and access to reproductive health services. The future is nigh, and shit, Constitutionality is forever, if not nearly impossible to undo in any other state than California.

May 20, 2009

Pandora’s Box 2.0

I have been hemming and hawing over what my first post should be for some time. I have drafts of their beginnings saved, thoughtfully unfinished, all the while still without a published post. The key line of questioning that I keep butting up with is, “What part of my self do I choose to first peel back the skin of?”, and  “Who do I choose to introduce, and how?”  This is a great place to mention my intimately thoughtful and careful indecision, please, it’s not complete pompous.

In the preparation to begin an honest blog, I may have had a better chance blindfolding myself and pointing an eager forefinger at the spinning globe of my many selves, before landing it down with decisive, “THERE!” Can I peel back the blindfold yet?

Or, another thought that rattled around in the questioning, was the assurance of sounding as articulate, decided, and intelligent I am. Because, I thought, and silently feel, that the message I have been receiving has been heavily laced with a trumped importance of how you present. (Feminists, Queers, and Sex Workers- you don’t know just how much you have in common!)  Equipped with an understanding that there would be some kind of audience, I was more distraught with the fact of presenting an over-simplified, safely non-multidimensional, wholly rational, cool, and collected self. If this was to be the case, I better be damn sure about the ‘one’ I actually choose.

I stared blankly at my Twitter text box, the receptive cursor taunting me, as a flood of fiery emotions stirred in my gut. See, I had just opened the Pandora’s box of an external hard drive that had been used to harvest all the good of the past 5 years out of my old laptop before it died.

After a simple search for a resume and some kitschy costumed shots from my Pro years past, I found myself knee deep in pictures that were as unwelcome at this time of the night as they were in this day of my cycle. Pictures of a loved one that had died this past year, a wretched but codependent bound partner, and consequently, myself as broken and then rebuilt. There were pictures of the fierce dyke self that I had unknowingly lost, the gender fucking radical bike queer that was lost a little later, manifestos, plans of action, letters to abusers, and all of the love lost and pain I am only able to read from them now.

Turning away from the omnipotent Twitter, I ruminated. Should there be a place, online, where I don’t have to present as an easily read caricature of what I would like to be, or an oversimplification of what I am? What role does self-censorship really play?  We all must do it. Present some mild censorship or persona in order to feel safer, if not more credible in our respective fields. Not only as credible and capable activists and advocates, as well-polished or diamond in the rough Pros, but as how we choose to present one side of our most desirable, coy, collected, novel, well-educated, wise, what ever selves – in order to feel safe and understood in our own contexts. Especially, in the public and individually controllable open forum blogging presents. For many of us, our images, intellects, personas, and selves have first come into being in someone else’s hands and under someone else’s control. So as a Sex Worker, Queer, Survivor, and subversive, it is easy to understand blogging as an effective, even seductive way of recapturing how we ‘read’ to ‘outside’ communities, while reauthoring what we are to ourselves and our own communities.

I ended up talking with a friend about the fumbles I had before me as an advocate, and burgeoning adult and former sex worker who now felt perpetually unprepared.  “I wish there was a practice ground where I could make these mistakes”, I said.  And she replied with something like, ” But there’s not, this is it, you have to do it in front of everyone, at your own expense, and that is how you learn.”

During my recently ending (?) 7 year tenure as a Sex Worker, I learned a lot about compartmentalization. Which was most often a necessary tool for personal safety and my own piece of mind, especially within an often hostile Southern map dot, and respectively suspect activist communities. As a survivor, of many lived experiences, I also learned a lot about compartmentalization. Again, it was somewhat of a primal tool utilized for survival and safety. And as a Queer, Gender Queer, one-time identified Dyke, Feminist, and unapologetic radical, I learned not only about surviving, but about relearning and breaking those walls between selves, within the multitude of innumerable identities, down.

So, will this convolute any message I try to tackle here ? (Which may take a turn for the mundane, for I must warn you, I have half a mind to host this as part food blog, part former Sex Worker reflection. Multidimensional! See, a real, live, Sex Worker! ) Maybe a lot of those articulate and brilliant bloggers who choose to explore their sex, sexuality, and Sex Work publicly, know something I don’t. Regardless, I have always been one incredibly wily and stubborn being. So if it’s a mistake to intermingle my personal struggles and all of my collective selves- including the polished and proud Pro, and the student finding their way into adulthood- then I will happily make them.

Plus, I refuse to do any kind of skillful dance to maintain an (non-paying) audience, even my few years on the pole (as a riot-grrrl, no less) taught me that. That is to say, even for the few stumbles of  readers that may find me, or recruits from the sexual and sex work blogosphere, I don’t want to feel the need to let my inner Domme always do the talking,  to whip out an impressive kink fact, an account of my latest dare-devil orgasm or edge-play, in order to validate myself as a Sex Worker, or to keep ‘the hook’ in. I also rebel against pressure. So, push me into a latex catsuit and 7-inch spiked platforms, no matter how well I know them, and I will put on an apron, bake you some vegan muffins in the blink of an eye, with the grace of a Southern Belle. Be prepared. It may get domestic, nerdy, and even perhaps, boring.